I.TAS. NOS. 1158(IB) AND 1159(IB) OF 1986-87, 11(IB), 12(IB),639(IB), 506-A(IB) TO 506-F(I$),V versus I.TAS. NOS. 1158(IB) AND 1159(IB) OF 1986-87, 11(IB), 12(IB),639(IB), 506-A(IB) TO 506-F(I$),
Rule 12 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules 1981 is not mandatory but the directory is non-compliant when necessary as the above roll is a directory. The Tribunal may, at its discretion, assign in compliance with the said rule. As the Tribunal thinks that the rules have been knowingly and willfully violated, it may refuse to enjoy an appeal where the non-compliance is unintentional or inaccurate and the defendant knows the appeal. Non-compliance will not be deadly. The procedure for service by the registered post is not required to appeal. Non-compliance of Rule 12 in the reference requests is not fatal to the reference requests.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Khair Pur Mir lawyer