Find a Lawyer

GHULAM DASTAGIR versus BENAZIR BHUTTO

Article 63 (i) (g) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973, to propagate an opinion without prejudice to doctrine, sovereignty, integrity or security, or morality, or care or to be elected as a member of the National Assembly in any way Disqualification of the public order or the integrity or independence of the judiciary which discredits or humiliates the judiciary or the armed forces of Pakistan will be disqualified by being selected or elected, and by becoming a member of parliament the documents will also be disqualified. I was offered. Defendant's book, which the defendant expressed in some remarks about the Chief Justice High Court and Supreme Court judges, expressed these views in 1988, but no one from the High Court or Supreme Court appellants No action was taken. However, it failed to prove that the defendant was currently propagating or in the past opinion against the judiciary as propaganda of institutional response, thereby disqualifying Dante from being elected to the Member of Parliament based on the documents presented on the record. Was not given law firms from Pannu aqil lawyer