Find a Lawyer

BARKAT BIBI versus SAKINA BIBI

In paragraph 19 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the vacant property transferred to the refugees of Jammu and Kashmir in lieu of the rehabilitation of the wife and son of Section 115AVT was separated because of his accompanying family in the allotment chute. On the death of Allotment, the members of the Allotment Chit as members of the Alliance family were transferred their rights to the surviving fellow family members in the Allotment, who were later questioned. Land ownership rights were granted, so the acquired allottee was sold to the buyer for a dive ride. His married daughter, who was not affiliated with it, because the family member had claimed his share in the land through the institutional suit which was dismissed as well as his appeal was the daughter of the allottee, whether the land in question. Whether or not the victim has the right to claim the part in the temporary allotment was for the purposes of caring for himself, his wife and son, which he created in the family unit, after the death of Alazari, After receiving all, his rights in the allotment were temporarily transferred to the surviving family members, and thus the deceased El Washroom did not have the rights to live in sin, never married daughter was not considered a member of the family. The agricultural land allocated for maintenance purposes was not inherited because the right to seek and to seek rehabilitation was terminated and thereafter allotted for the benefit of surviving members who were entitled to property rights. The sale was legitimately sold after the acquisition. This law is protected by law advocate from Havelian lawyer