Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus MUHAMMAD DIN

CPC Adjustments O XVII of Civil Procedure Code Order XVII, R 3 End of Evidence on the Postponed Date of Hearing, Validation of Defendants Failing to Produce Evidence on the Date of Hearing, Payment of Expenses Permitted, With the condition that there will be no further postponement. Defendants' permission to prepare evidence failed to present evidence to the postponement date; their evidence was closed by the trial court under Rule 0 XVII, R 3, CPC The order was not challenged by the defendants because it was rejected by the plaintiff. The trial court and its appeal were also dismissed for illegal prosecution. In the appeal, the High Court allowed the defendants to challenge the correctness of the order closing their evidence, but failed to convince them that the order passed by the trial court in closing their evidence law. Was wrong. In the presence of the defendants that they were given the last opportunity to prepare evidence, it was permissible to close their evidence on failure to present evidence at the postponement date [evidence]. female advocates from Kohat lawyer