SHABBIR TILES AND CERAMICS LIMITED versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL), CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, KARACHI
Section 3 (4) Central Excise Rules, 1944, RR 53, 226, 237, 238 and 246 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction to confiscate goods, the practice of allegations against the company was that for the applicants. Was production, approval and advice. Is it that the defendants were not paying any heed to the point that the applicants in respect of such payments, in proof of their statement that they were being charged sales tax on both types of cotton waste? A table is recorded in the record. Appendix D1 and its validation have been confirmed by the Inspector, Central Excise and Land Customs which is posted in the premises of the applicant mill. The letter sent (Collector, Central Excise and Land Customs, Hyderabad), the balance of the goods, which is ready and cleared by the company within a month, did not enter the registered RG1. And wer large quantities of manufactured goods
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Jampur lawyer
