Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ARIF KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH HOME SECRETARY

Section 3 523 and 505050 Constitution of Pakistan, Section 9 of the Constitution Police were not allowed to seize the applicant's house Police did not get any warrant from the concerned magistrate to go to the applicant's house The conduct of the police officer is highly competent. The condemnation was that no one was allowed to enter the house, no one was reasonable. On the basis that the petitioner has committed a crime and no record has been brought in this regard, the High Court directed that the custody of the confiscator be handed over to the applicant.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• ZAFAR IQBAL v. NASREEN AHMED 2014 CLD 1039
• ABDUL QAYYUM v. State 2014 MLD 1046
• UMER FAROOQUE v. JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, MIRPURKHAS 2014 PCrLJ 1052
• ASIF TRADERS v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS through Assistant Collector 2014 PTD 1057
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. MEHMOOD ELAHI 2014 CLC 1060
• AYAZ ALI v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 1060
• MUHARRAM v. State 2014 MLD 1065
• HABIB v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1067

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

famous supreme court advocate from Padidan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes