Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RAUF versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

Section 260 (h) of the City Corporation Act 1941 (X9 of 1897), section 21 of the Town Planning Scheme, had been permanently prohibited in connection with certain categories of open space. The same government order was challenged in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court Town Planning Scheme, in which the construction of buildings in connection with a specific place was permanently prohibited, under Section 260, City of Lahore Corporation Act 1941. The applicants had obtained the scheme's approval under section 260. , The City of Lahore Corporation Act, 1941, could no longer apply that under the provision of section 260, the City of Lahore Corporation Act 1941 provided a comprehensive mechanism for initiating a scheme, for reservation under the provisions. The essential scope of the Fact Act was deemed with particular characteristic to ease the prohibitions contained in the Town Planning Scheme, the Corporation either did not independently comply with the Corporation's direction and it was not shown The prohibition contained in the CI (B), Section 260, City of Lahore Corporation Act. In 1941, after the disappearance of a land or element, which required a restriction and in the absence of a power to express it, and in view of the restrictions contained in the General Clause Act 1897, the corporation was required to adopt appropriate procedures. And they are also convinced on the court's request that this has not been done, a corporation order under which it ordered relaxation in a specific area prohibiting the construction of the housing scheme not only in form but also in substance. Legal errors were encountered. immigration advocate from Turbat lawyer