STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR versus SAIDUL HAQ
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 448 and 506 did not prove the complainant had his original or constructive possession in the disputed shop and no offense was proved under Section 7 or 7 or 8 448, therefore, the trial court had consciously kept the relevant evidence in mind. Applied and considered according to the guidelines laid down by the trial court's decision in the High Courts, Matt was neither abusive nor illegal, nor was he against bad compulsion on a strong and extraordinary basis. The same appeal was available for interference which was excluded under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
