Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR versus ZAIUR RAHIM

The Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was in the interest of the applicant's father and defendant, which shows that the former fulfilled his or her favor in favor of the applicant. The right was surrendered. It was subsequently filed with the decision-making authorities under which the PTO was issued in favor of the applicant and subsequently PTD was also presented to him when his interest was presented. After Roe's death, the respondents filed for the claim that the Debate Association, the PTO and the PTD issued in favor of the applicant were illegal, void and void and that they were the property of the property. Suits were entitled to inherit, and such order was upheld in both the appeal and review and the PTO and PTD issued in favor of the applicants. Leave a request to appeal to the respondents' interests not challenged in the interest of the respondent. Consider all the points arising out of this case as a result of its silence and conduct as it has accepted leave of appeal. property advocate from Okara lawyer