Find a Lawyer

DOST MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Section 13 Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Rules of Suppressing Sections 7 and 8 Terrorist Activities (Special Courts), 1975, R6 (2) Order of Punishment Approved by the Special Court Has clearly shown that there was no fair trial against the accused, but they were declared as serious and were sentenced to seven years RI and fined Rs. 95,000, without charge. There was also a word of proof that the Special Court did not mention under which law he had sentenced the accused and sentenced him to severe punishment, and he had speculated on the crime against the accused. The importation of a law related to this was forcibly misunderstood, a concept that would arise when the prosecution had brought some evidence against the accused's primary fiction to show that the accused had committed a crime. He was charged and in the absence of any evidence, no possibility of offense against the accused could be created. The trial court's order was clearly declared invalid and the girl was not persistent. top advocates from Shogram lawyer