Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM HYDER versus MUKHTIARKAR AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER


Appeal for review of Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Sindh Public Property Act 1975, petitioner's competent petition filed for review by Mukhtarkar, under which Mukhtarkar allegedly sought instead of hearing on the property request. Was directed to remove restrictions on public property made from. Referring to the same to be dismissed by himself or the relevant tribunal, the applicant was also sent back to the Assistant Commissioner Mukhyarkar after being notified as the competent officer, the revision request was duly submitted to the applicant. Was filed by and should not have been submitted for presentation. The remand was sought for a decision on the request for review of the Assistant Commissioner's case, which will be considered pending before the MLA in light of the observations made by the court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Pannu aqil lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.