Find a Lawyer

RASOOL BIBI versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB

XLI, XI, R 17 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of Applicants of the CCC Rules Order relating to the original rules of the CPC were dismissed, the appeal for restoration of the appeal was also dismissed. On the basis of the limitation made, but also on the basis that there is no plausible explanation for the absence of the applicants and no petition for condolences to the delay of the High Court in the review, the Appellate Court appealed the decision. To leave O XLI, R 17 (1), the CPC allowed the appellate court to dismiss the appeal when neither the appellant nor his lawyer was present when an appeal was sought for a hearing. The date of the relevant date and the reason that this fact was discovered by the courts through the courts. Appeal was not sufficient to warrant restitution, the Supreme Court could not, in the absence of arbitration or misapplication of these reasons, set aside a single petition for leave to appeal. Under no qualifying conditions [Federation of Pakistan and 2 others vs. Mohammad Haneef 1981 CLC 130 rejected] immigration advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer