Find a Lawyer

DILAWAR KHAN versus GHULAM NABI

The Code of Conduct 1908 Section 11 and O II, R2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Plaintiffs' declaration and permanent injunction were dismissed until they were co-owners of the immovable property. The High Court has reviewed the case on the basis that Constitutional Race Judesta was also banned and leave to appeal to the plaintiff for appeal of the O II, R2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 is also not available. Could not show previous lawsuits / decisions regarding the property. Could not act as a constructive justice, so if the Constitutional Justice question is viewed from the viewpoint of the plaintiffs, the application for leave to appeal will not succeed on this assumption, or the questions raised in the litigation before Are taken up and decided, the present litigation will take place. Prohibited by Race Judeta, and if the current litigation cannot be brought to the previous litigation, O II, R 2, the Civil Procedure Code will be once in Rome, whichever angle, for leave to appeal. The request was not upheld The appeal was denied in such circumstances best advocate from Jacobabad lawyer