ALI HASSAN versus DISTRICT MANAGER, SINDH ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HYDERABAD
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), charged with removal of Sections 2 and 15 from the service of the appellant on the charge of the watchman, on a charge of alleged corruption. Went and was dismissed from employment after a domestic investigation. The appellant was not a laborer and, therefore, could not invalidate the provisions of Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance. The appellant was charged with committing a misconduct under the Standing Orders Ordinance and other laws, which clearly shows that the employer applied the standing order ordinance. In the case of the appellant; in such a way that they have dealt with an elderly person that it is proof that the appellant was not a laborer, for which he did not charge. Appellant's evidence clearly shows that he did manual work and was a worker described under section 2 (1) of the West Pakistan Ordinance. The appellant's order was restored in 1969
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Chowk Maitla lawyer