Find a Lawyer

Z.Z. AHMAD versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKSITAN

OX, R 6 (l) (a), OX, R 4 (2) & O OX, R 4 (2) The trial court ruled against the defendant on the basis that he appeared before her personally. I was unsuccessful. Without a valid excuse from the trial court, no brief statement of the case has been filed or committed for the trial court without the excuse granted by the trial court against the defendant under OX, R 4 (2). The points, and neither the decision nor the reason for the decision. Wanted by OXX, R 4 (2), but only cited the fact that the defendant had consistently failed to appear in a court of law with no excuse on the due date, with neither party's evidence recorded Nor does the defendant examine, in the scope of the court O IX, R 6 (1) (a), CPC despite express reference to the provisions of OX, R 4 (2), CPC by the trial court. Arrived. best advocate from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer