MANZUR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
Section 2 302, 7 30 evidence and 9449 names of the accused, names of witnesses, weapons used for the crime and evidence contained in the facts of the arrest of the accused from the time of the incident to the hour of FIR investigation The incident and the record filed afterwards did not indicate that the same was not recorded at the place and time as the case was of the sole accused and there was no serious enmity with the witnesses in the light of day and the incident. Their presence on occasion was enough. Naturally, such statements cannot be ruled out because their statements could have been acknowledged because of their relationship with the deceased, and there was no cross-examination. And the defendant had adequately described the injuries to the individual upon request of the defense. The suspect seemed to have a thought that was not proven and there was no reasonable chance of being charged, so he was rightly sentenced by the trial court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Chak Jhumra lawyer
