MUKHTAR AHMAD ALIAS BHOLI versus THE STATE
Statement of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Sections 342 and 340 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1800), Section 302 of Section 342, CRPC under oath by the accused without oath (2) was read by the trial court as evidence of an oath. , CRPC, rejecting an allegation that was not possible under Law Minor in which the trial court acted to record the defendant's statement, recorded under section 4040 ((2)) of the trial court. The statement could not be approved, it was illegal on the face of the PC and could not be read as evidence of the oath and consequently the conviction and sentence of the accused were set aside and the trial court proceeded to trial. The remand was made so that the accused's statement under section 4040 ((?), CRPC) of the law could be re-recorded and after hearing the parties' arguments on the merits. Exclusive presence evidence to decide the case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer
