ROMAN ALI KHAN TANOLI versus MALIK KHURRAM SHAHZAD
O. XXXVII, RR 2 and 3 for the defense of the summary suit based on the negotiating device, the scope for the defense of the scope of leave was approved under the bank guarantee offer in the case of the defendant not only the defendant. Failure to comply with the direction of the trial court, but he did not submit a written statement and his defense was dismissed and the legal proceedings against him were unconditionally defending or subject to such conditions. , Vacation and recording affairs or other terms. As the court deemed appropriate, the defendant failed to appear and the former party order was passed in the plaintiff's trial, the condition of presenting bank guarantee in the trial was justified while the defense The plaintiff never refused to be hanged for leave. Appropriate action was initiated against the defendant in dishonor to the defendant, according to the court's directive to deliver public checks and failing to submit the required bank guarantee and submitting the W, resulting in the defendant's An order was received in favor
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
