Find a Lawyer

AMBRIN BEGUM versus DEV-KISHAN AIIAS KISHAN

Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 12 and 42 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 144, along with specific performance of the suit agreement declare negative possession of the property in question claiming that the plaintiff was occupying the suit property. Nothing was available for sale by the tenant. The contract indicating that the possession of the property was handed over to the plaintiff, indicating that the contract contains a clause stating that the real estate holder is the seller, the seller of the seller / defendant And will remain until the plaintiff's registration is registered. An anonymous buyer was found by Beer, the appellate court, and such address was taken from the plaintiff and her husband, the tenant of the property, was the signatory to the sale agreement, and thus the contents of the claimant or her husband. Were responsible for , He considered the property in question to be in negative possession solicitors from Fizagat lawyer