Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD AYUB

The appearance and non-appearance of the parties to the CPC's Civil Procedure Code Order IX were properly served with the O IX, R 13 and Section 115 former Order Defendants and advice for their representation What was neither the defendant nor his lawyer appeared in the court during the trial. Subsequently, the order of the former party against the defendants was issued and the defendants' plea for separation of the former party decree was dismissed, so their appeal on the question of fact was also found by the courts. That the defendants are negligent and there is no reason for it. Put the preceding order aside Defendants were not able to identify any misunderstanding or evidence read by the courts below; there is no illegal, material irregularity or permanent error in the order approved by the courts below. The modification jurisdiction was denied due to. immigration advocates phone number from Sakardu lawyer