Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD AHMAD versus MUSARRAT ARA

The Code of Conduct 1908 Section 115 (1), the provisions, OV, RR 10 A & 20 and O IX, R 13, the service of review by the applicants in reference to the paper was absolutely correct, the applicant also by registered post ounce. The summons was sent to. Prove the cases that were within the time required to apply for a former party decree approved by the trial court against the applicant and whether there were reasons for rejecting the previous order on the applicant, however , As a witness in the evidence of such matters and even presenting a witness, he did not attach the certified copies of the statements of the witnesses that he had stated and submitted by the witnesses requesting a review. The High Court was not, in the review, praised. As to whether the applicant was not properly presented or not, nor was there any reason for her not appearing before the court. famous supreme court advocate from Hariwala lawyer