Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAHIM versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

The OI, R 10 Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XX8II of 1958), Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 and the 1991 Settlement Authority have the capability to engage parties in pending proceedings. At the request of the parties, the Settlement Authority ordered the implementation of the pending proceedings to be applied to the High Court, with constitutional jurisdiction aside, the order of the parties to apply was the question of legality contained in the appeal. Whether the estate authority has the jurisdiction to apply the parties before the High Court in this case, while Re There is nowhere to be said in this case that any new interested party should not be included in the proceedings. The High Court did not dispute that the settling authority had the power to enforce any required party in the Constitutional Court for proceedings. Option to transfer a disputed property without valid options d After proper investigation and inquiry, it is determined that the provisions of OI, R 10, CPC are applied to the Settlement Authority, the Settlement Authority, while the interested parties have the law. The jurisdiction exercised by it has to be exercised, but there was no compelling reason to revoke the settlement order. The decision of the Authority High Court was set aside and the order of the Settlement Authority was restored, in which case the appeal was allowed: best advocate from Tarmatan lawyer