GHULAM RASOOL versus GHULAM MURTAZA
The Special Relief Act, 1877, declared in the 42nd Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act (V12 of 1912), Section 10 Land Grant Policy, the grant of the plaintiffs in the state land claim that the accused in his possession was in the grant of allotment. Was not included. And the same should be settled by the Land Grant Policy Trial Court pursuant to the claimant's case, but the appellate court rejected the same correctness of the appellate decision found in the review in which the plaintiff had submitted a certified copy of the record of rights. It turns out that this question is underground. The original Alteshi plaintiff was never included in the specified acreage but the claim was never denied by the defendants, therefore, no claim was made about the land in which The original allotment decision was not included in the allotted loot. The appellate court was set aside while the trial court was reinstated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Naudero lawyer