MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus MUHAMMAD MAROOF
West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules 1968 Section 17 The West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the appointment of a Section 38 Lumber Leader was appointed by only one of the seven applicants for the post of GA: Collector and this appointment was retained. Two of the applicants were reviewed by the Commissioner against the order of the Commissioner Board of Revenue and after reviewing the case, the remand of the collector to the applicant was decided by the GA, who was appointed by the Revenue Officers below. , Filed a constitutional petition against the Board of Revenue High's decision. The court has so far canceled the orders of the Board of Revenue as long as it belonged to one of the applicants before the Board of Revenue but let the board's remand order remain in the field instead of standing in honor of the other applicant collector. Demanded to seek the contestants. Called each of the original applicants and appointed a person who was not even a competing party before the smell and the Commissioner of the Order of Revenue or the High Court appointed another applicant in the appeal Neither was the legal remand order of the contesting party, the parties against which the court decision still stands, it was not challenged, and if challenged, the party did not succeed. One was declared village collector by the Collector and confirmed by Commissioner Petitioner GA, under which both the courts Recommended in the first round of litigation. Was appointed as a Field and Lumbermaster
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Issa Khel lawyer