C.I.T., CENTRAL ZONE `B\', KARACHI versus MESSRS HUSSAIN SUGAR MILLS LTD.
The questions contained in Section 150 of the Convention of Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 6 and 7 Evidence Act (of 1872), Sections 123 and 124 were purely a matter of assessment and did not include any secrets related to state affairs or state secrets. Documents were not included. The Income Tax Officer wrote a letter in action that was pending before him, and the assessment of such letter clearly falls on the rights and obligations of the Assisi, which was held, knowing the facts. Which had an impact on the Income Tax Officer. In order to disclose the contents of the letter it is obligatory to defend itself on the points raised by it, documents relating to the state's trade, trade or contract activities are generally Cannot claim privilege as is not related to Income Tax Officer matters. Letter
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
