Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MUBEEN KAZI versus WAHID REHMAN INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD.

Civil Procedure Code Order XXXVIIA XXXVII of the CPC Summary Procedure, leave leave to appear and defend the suit in the jurisdiction of the R3 Summary The defendant developed a scheme whereby each member was required to attend each month. I have to contribute a certain amount. Of the contributing members, much was to be prepared each month, and the member who was named was to receive the work from the defendant, and under this scheme the plaintiff was successful and thereafter he was required to pay any installment. Was not required and he became entitled to the vehicle without paying. However, in another part, the defendant either denied the promised car or denied that the acquisition of the scheme was a benefit to the defendant's conduct and defense, which would have cost the participating member of the scheme a lot of money. , Which was an uncertainty as there was a lot of opportunity and expectation in joining the scheme and not until the end of the payment of installments did the plaintiff present a debatable case. That if successful, he would have to pay at least the full amount that he received as a contribution. There is no defensive or comprehensible ground for defending such a refund made by the plaintiff. There is a partial decree to the extent of the amount the plaintiff was given in favor of the claimant with interest. The money was given a conditional leave to prosecute and defend the bank guarantee. registration advocate from Bahawalpur lawyer