Find a Lawyer

PIR MUHAMMAD KHAN versus AZIZ MUHAMMAD

Border Pre-Emission Act 1950 Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Applicants initially exchanged their land with non-contestants under the review of the market value shown in the revenue record As a result, the sale mutation was filed in favor of the applicant by non-mutation. As shown in the Revenue Records at the time of the mutation, the defendants, who had previously competed in relation to the land acquired by them before the price, filed a pre-arrest claim against the applicant that the allegation was made. That the transaction was primarily a sale but as it was disposed of, the respondents' pre-discrimination claim was ordered by the Applicant / Appeal and review both failed and the three courts below the leave to appeal it. The respondents were correct in holding that the non-compete respondents in the guise of exchange I sold the land records show that the change was made by one of the respondents considered for sale, no statement of non-competition g was recorded with the respondents that they had obtained land with the applicants. Under the fact that the courts are badly affecting the applicants. This seems reasonable and fair. top advocates from Bisham lawyer