Find a Lawyer

RUQAYYA YASMIN versus MUHAMMAD RIAZ

The Guardians and Wards Act 1890 Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The father of minors claimed the custody of minors on the issue, that the mother was not a woman of good character, therefore, it was not in the welfare of the minor. During the proceedings, the mother remarried to the Guardian Judge because of the remarriage of the mother with a stranger, ordering the minor to be handed over to her father, the mother relying on the minor Guardian judge's order. Lost the right The appellate court legal orders of the courts affirmed her, which shows that the only reason she was instructed to hand over the minors to her father was because of her remarriage, the mother in the lower court. Lose your right to Pay close attention to the evidence on the record bell to determine whether the welfare of minors will continue to be with the mother, even though she may be remarried or only one by the courts. This element was considered a question of the welfare of minors. All other reasons were subject to the above-mentioned consideration, the fact that the minor's mother's remarriage was one of the factors that could be considered in the decision of the dispute but did not form. Thus the courts below were caught in a serious error in deciding to apply for custody of minors on the grounds that the courts below also failed to consider whether any of the facts regarding the remarriage of the mother. Not compatible. Male children, because, this principle only applies when court orders are legally binding advocate from Bagh lawyer