JAVID AKHTAR versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Termination for Corruption of Government Employees Showcases notice on a government employee rather than adopting a broad inquiry process by the Inquiry Officer After being examined and examined in the defense, they were dismissed by the competent authority. The request of the public servants was not successful before the higher departmental authorities and even one of their bridges failed before the service tribunal. You might be concerned with the smaller method available. There is no choice of a public servant to examine the employee's conduct, nor can he insist that a procedure be adopted to exclude the other, after the service tribunal has examined the facts independently of any Which has confirmed the search of the departmental authorities. Thus there was a question of law that required further examination by leave of the Supreme Court efused in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
