Section 13 (2) (vi), Proviso [as amended by the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction (North West Frontier Province Amendment) Ordinance (XII of 1972]] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3). The leave was granted Check whether the applicant was not entitled to benefit from the terms contained in the ordinance by amending the 1972 Ordinance (which could not exclude the tenant if it was rented In the default case of payment, acknowledges his obligation and paid the rent); just because another request for removal (personal need) Was done but was not allowed. What were the conditions for providing benefits under the aforementioned plan, especially if it was necessary that the rental control pass the rental submission order? Whether the applicant complied with all the conditions in the article (keeping in view the requests and statements of both parties) and whether the High Court should have refused to reject its arbitrary constitutional process.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
