THE STATE versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY PUNJAB, LAHORE
In a meeting to consider the nominations by the High Court for Shariat Course, the Additional Chief Secretary, Government of the Punjab, initially acted not only in the manner prescribed under Sections 3 and 4 of the High Court Act 1976 had gone. Disagreeing the High Court's authority but contradictory remarks were also used against the judicial notice and accordingly he was directed to appear in court and explain why he did not initiate contempt proceedings against him. The respondent in his written reply denied this fact. The allegations leveled against him were eventually demanded unconditional apology, he was chosen not to fight the notice and he was thrown at the mercy of a competitor without proper apology, the right attitude and the accused. In view of the proceedings presented by the court, it was felt that he sought sincere disqualification and in fact the Court had placed himself at the mercy of the court and there was reason for justice. The one who put himself at the mercy of the court, rather than proceeding or being punished, will be excluded from the proceedings. And notices were discharged in cases of contempt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
