SARTAJ STEEL WORKS versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
The worker's notice for payment of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 Section 10 Convention Allowance was sent twice by the Commissioner through a registered post to the person who claimed to own / occupy the Establishment. After the permit was given to the labor employer, the petition was later approved before the Commissioner so that the previous order could be fixed on the basis that it was not given notice but the request was rejected by the Commissioner's Record. I have given this address under Section 10 of Workers' Compensation. Notice was sent from this act, notice was sent to the wrong address; it cannot be said that the appellant has been acted upon, in which case the matter needs to be examined whether the person who received the notice. He was the owner / occupier of the establishment. And whether he was capable of receiving notice from the appellant, the commander did not say that on the lower points, it was not considered while after allowing the parties to present evidence after the decision of the lower party. The commissioner's order was once again placed with the instruction to decide the application.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Kahuta lawyer