Find a Lawyer

TAJ DIN versus SHER MUHAMMAD

The Property Act 1882 Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O II, R6, Sections 115 and 151 suits the use of such suit for the sale of various sales deeds that the absence of evidence in one set of evidence is sufficient. ? Not all cases were confirmed as vendors which are raised in the claimant's requests, it was to be decided in relation to the timing of the execution that caused the seller to suffer due to the relevant plaintiff. Can be claimed to have removed fingers. With respect to the time factor when different sales actions were performed, the issues related to the vendor's disability were to be decided in the light of the time factor in each case that the plaintiff is common in all three suits and the basis for the assault against the sale deeds was also common. That is, such a fact alone was not sufficient to stabilize and jointly destroy all suits. In the event of consolidation of all suits, the parties feared to terminate the position of Pro. In addition, in each case the trial had already reached an advanced level, the stability of the suit at the present stage was not likely to proceed because of the administration of justice to refuse to consolidate such cases. Since the order of the court was upheld in the interest of justice. However, the trial court was instructed to settle all the cases at once so that the circumstances were excluded from view to avoid any bias in the parties' case. advocates from Mir Ali lawyer