PAKISTAN RAILWAYS versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A (8) and 38 (3) of the Labor Court's automatic amending jurisdiction against the Labor Court accepted the respondents' complaint request and allowed them to work at a fixed rate of monthly salary. Was entitled to payment. Although the Labor Court order is a hearing, no appeal has been filed against the same applicants when the defendants filed a complaint under section 25A (8) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance Labor Court against which A revision was directed. Neither was the improper, illegal, nor the wrong Labor Appellate Tribunal's refusal to exercise its arbitrary jurisdiction against such an order under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer
