MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus SAKINA BIBI
Article 36 Orders, decisions or orders, excluding pre-emption suits that were either established or pending during the period 1 8 1986 to 28 3 1990, shall not be considered to have any legal effect, unless previously stated The right to immunity was claimed in the claim that was available under the ordinance decree, decisions and orders for dismissal of such suit have been rendered ineffective in the law and such cases apply under the provisions of section 36 (2). What was to be done - In this suit for the abolition of coercion, before which the decrees were approved in the original, appellate or revision forums before 31st, 1986, Whatever forum is pending, it should be executed in accordance with the law of the law first and then, but the suit in which the order was not given in favor of the Pratt Importer even before the target date, is not the same decision. And the case cannot be continued under the Punjab Pre-Emission Act.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Mandi Faizabad lawyer