AHMED MASOOD PIRACHA versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR HERL
Civil Procedure Code Order XXXVII of CPC Summary Procedure, OXXXVII, R3 and Section 151 summit jurisdiction on the negotiation instrument to appear and instruct defendants to unconditionally submit a written statement within three weeks. Allow the accompanying written statement, however, cannot be escaped. At the appointed time, the defendant filed an application for extension of time for filing the written statement, which was attached to the petition. The court ordered that the written statement filed by the defendant be brought on record. Was filed under which defendant was granted unconditional leave to appear and defend. The suit court set aside the order under which he granted unconditional leave to appear the same day and defend the case, after which the defendant's written statement was ordered to be presented to the record court, The latter order directed the defendant to appear and defend the case on his offer. The court ordered the security of the amount equal to the delay in filing opposing orders of the two Dimitri approvals, namely writing statements and bringing them on record. Remembering your first order of unconditional leave to follow a court-approved order would lead to ridiculous consequences rather than going beyond comprehension. On one hand, the defendant's written statement was on record. Was ordered and the delay in filing it was stopped. On the other hand, the defendant was discharged to defend the suit against the protection of his offer not to stand side by side with such controversial orders.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer