Section 2 302 Definition of Testimonial Proof of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was the declaration of the defendant's oral death in front of the prosecution's witnesses, all of whom were relatives, who was the victim's father, who confessed that he was blind was not. The witness of the incident was not discharged for any of his conversations with the deceased before his death, witnesses said in the statement that he had disclosed the incident to the deceased's parents on the day he died. He died the next day. The incident raises the question of why when the deceased was alive all day, why did they not report the matter to the police or call the doctor that same day, or the magistrate made a pre-dying statement? He could not be charged for verification as the truth of his contents was not free from any doubt. No post-mortem of the deceased was done after his death, even after the FIR, which lasted about two months to thirteen. Recorded day after day, his statements adversely affected the truth of the statement, with the contradictions in the testimony of the witnesses so as to make a report. Earlier, his evidence was deemed suspicious, untrustworthy and his confidence was not raised before his death, while the investigating officer was working in the kitchen and accidentally burned and said that the victim was The statement was not disputed by the complainant and the prosecutor's witness, and said that the death of the complainant and the witnesses was accepted. The accident report of the chemical inspection was negative because the defendant did not provide even a single piece of evidence for the purpose of prosecution.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
