TAQI versus THE STATE
Section 156 (1) (8) (89) of the Criminal Code (V9 1898), Sections 561A, 540 and 428 containers / packets were not proved in the trial court in any way, but agreed to confirm their contents. They had not been opened since. Thus the contradictory stand taken by both sides regarding the contents of the containers suggests the preparation of the containers and the presence of a witness who did not perform the same or demanded any defect. Nor did it assist in the prosecution's case, but obviously promote its termination. Justice facilitates the court to arrive at a reasonable conclusion about the articles originally seized at the time of its confiscation and Accordingly, an order was made for the determination of appeal only.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer
