IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN versus AND GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Section 17 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1977 The previous benefits of reinstatement did not prove any charge against the appellant and the service tribunal allowed them all the benefits they were entitled to. But the authorities did not allow the suspension of the suspension period nor the leave without the leave without pay, as no compensation was proved against the appellant as its suspension period was assumed. Can be accepted, in connection with the approval of leave without pay, to the appellant not long after his reinstatement. Was approved. And the support requested for this relief could not be included as part of the appeal topic
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kotla Jam lawyer
