MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus CHAIRMAN, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, MIRPUR
Section 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, to apply for the Luxury Standing Constitution, the jurisdiction of the applicants was based on the claim that, when in question, and the application for allotment. If given, such a plot would have been dealt with. Respondents' claim is an opportunity to be heard without knowing that the applicant's claim was contradicted by the evidence on record that the applicant was neither in his possession nor applied for the plot that W, the victim. There was neither a verdict against it nor was it wrongly excluded from the petitioner's question, there was no locus standi to request constitutional jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Parachinar lawyer
