KHALID FAROOQ versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Section 8 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 4 Civil Servant Appeal Rules, 1977, Rr 5 (4) and 7 (1) (c). As shown above. Authorities in the seniority list also challenge the appellant's circulating respondents' advertising, but the appellant's representation was not kept on record and could not be determined when it was filed and not vice versa. It was stated that the fact that the representation was filed late and because challenged by the appellant through the prohibition did not verify the record when the representation of the appellant was withheld and his Addresses were also not sent on the basis that because of the time restriction, the Order of Authority had asked for a stop representation. ? , Was unthinkable because it did not proceed with the representation of a time restriction under any legal sanctions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer