Find a Lawyer

RIFFAT ALI BARQ versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION, MUZAFFARABAD

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 561 An Exploratory Code (XLV of 1860), Section 294 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Int. Court of Appeal FIR The required components are not displayed. Under Section 294, the PPC raiding party did not see the appellant and his female accomplices as the person who allegedly committed the act, who informed the police in this regard, did not present it as a witness. Went, so was the whole trial, which was not proof of hearing. The prosecution had ceased to be a public place under which the appellant filed a petition filed by the appellant for the registration of a criminal case in court and a riot without illegal and lawful authority 55 Section5 A, CR P.C. , But Article 61AA was a writ petition read with the provisions of the CCPC, because there was no concrete evidence against the accused appellant so the request could not be dismissed. The High Court held that on the technical grounds that the evidence was still to be recorded and that the interference at this stage would have prevented the prosecution and that no offense had been proved against the appellant and consequently the High Court's accompanying accused The decision was postponed and action was taken against the appellant and his accomplices. Without being misused by legal powers and court proceedings, being outlawed criminal advocate from Gilgit lawyer