Find a Lawyer

QASIM KHAN versus ALI KHAN

West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 Section 52 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 The record of rights without affirming the ownership of the ownership column from the ownership column for the relevant period shows that the plaintiff and the supporting pharma defendant The predecessor question was recorded as the owner of certain portions of the underground land and that their names were owned by the subsequent jamabandis in favor of the remaining shareholders without any co-transfer confirmation. Were excluded so that they could own their shares in addition to the lawsuit. It was positively held that in the interest of the plaintiff and pro-pharma defendants, the names of the predecessors were wrongly excluded from the ownership column and the plaintiff appealed to the court not to disturb such finding. The relevant case was decided by the trial court. In the interest of the defendant and the pro forma defendants from Jamabandi the wrongdoing of the names of the predecessors was a special year and thereafter, the appellant contested with the defendants on the trial court's finding on the removal of the names from the ownership column. No cross objection was filed before the Court or in the review, ultimately finding the fact that such waiver was legally in the interest of the plaintiff and the defendant pharma defendants in the land. They could not afford to lose their property rights and despite leaving their names in the tax records, Was considered certain extent co-owner shares his work and died claimant and defendant Farm Defense discussed the legal ground list of supreme court advocates from Mailsi lawyer