ZARIN versus MOMIN KHAN
Section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O XX, R 14 pre-emption order was to be pre-discrimination. Submitted by a specific date, which falls on a closed holiday, the pre-emptor, upon reopening the court, applies for a pre-concentration deposit and the next day, OXX, R14. , Mandates the provision of CPC legal status. In order to pay the balance of the purchase in the first ruling court, according to the instructions in the decree where the order date falls on the holiday, the pre-emptor can pay the court on reopening of the pre-emptor, reopening the court. However, the application for the submission of a pre-emption amount, which the vendor resisted, applied for the removal of the case because of a non-deposit on the pre-importer's due date. What he did in court and thereafter, the process of depositing money in the Treasury / Bank was with the help of this court and there was no individual responsibility under it. The decree not to deposit the same day was not the result of a defect by the pre-emptor for which he could not have lost the fruits of the legally authorized license in which the decree for payment of the sale balance. The directive included was in compliance with such deliberations and there was previously a viable injunction in favor of the umpire for possession through the development of the suit, which the execution court prohibited.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Arifwala lawyer