Find a Lawyer

ABDUS SATTAR versus WALI MUHAMMAD

Arbitration Act 1940 Section 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction Parties express interest even though certain persons, namely Section 21, were interested parties in the meaning of Arbitration Act 1940 and this is a mixed question of the Appellate Court. Was. As such, only the competing parties of the Pro-Pharma Defendants filed four suits in the International Court of Justice, which were consolidated and the parties competing in the only competing suit in which certain individuals were sued. Were included because the defendants made the statement. Before the Appellate Court, the names of specific individuals should be removed from the list of defendants. Such specific persons cease to be parties to the conclusion that the award and the court's order were not binding on them in respect of which the names of the particular persons were excluded. In this case, they could not complain about the award and the decree, because they were not parties to the meaning of Section 21, Arbitration Act, 1940, and Article 199, Constitution of Pakistan Appellate Court. Deciding whether specific individuals were interested in its jurisdiction, its decision was invalid as the constitutional petition filed against the appellate court's decision was inappropriate. ask a advocate free from Moro lawyer