Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT versus THE STATE

The testimony of the evidence in Sections 2 & 2 and Part I4, Part I was not delayed, but it seemed to have been recorded on the occasion with motivational defense version complimenting the ocular testimony in the juxtaposition, the latter It seems as if the facts were not factual and the incident took place as a request for the arrest of the accused and upon his report the recovery of blood stained theft was a suspicious case with the accused in the chest without any meditation. The fatal blow was made and he was charged at that very moment. Therefore, after convicting the offender of the accused under Section 2302, PPC, he was acquitted and sentenced under Section 4 304, Part I, PPC and sentenced to seven years imprisonment. Was. , CR PC attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Thatta lawyer