ABDUL OUDDUS versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, HYDERABAD
In the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960 Section 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the charges against Danto in the detention order do not specify when and why Dento was involved in terrorist acts. Provided the weapons and ammunition, the kind and how involved. Such accusations were not only vague, but also no record was endorsed by regional linguistic groups and people for rioting. Another accusation that Danto has been involved in social activities based on prejudice violations of the public order, and thus remaining vulnerable to public peace and tranquility, only given the reasons for his detention and, in fact, the basis of detention. Due to the material available to him, the prosecution was unable to support the detention order and as a result was terminated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
