DESIGN GROUP OF PAKISTAN versus CLIFTON CANTONMENT BOARD
Sections 9 and 11 ignored the proceedings of the case and did not act in a proper and legal manner and despite the protests frustrated the plaintiff's proceedings for the dismissal and appointment of any arbitral unit. Had moved forward temporarily. Gave the award after the expiry of the date without notice to the parties, in fact he did not call the parties to guide any evidence which was necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case and gave the award immediately on the basis of the claim. And the retaliation claims and documents filed by the parties, this procedure was termed as unnecessary and lacked respect for the laws and principles governing the arbitration proceedings. His appointment is guaranteed by the courts by another arbitrator.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
