Accused of transferring the petitioner's appeal for transfer of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 section 161 case, he alleged that he would not be judged as he sat the other party with the Presiding Officer of the Court Board of Revenue. Viewed without accusing the accused. In the matter of maximization, the case was moved that justice should not only be, but it should be.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
