Find a Lawyer

PIR BAKHSH versus STATE

The testimony of section 302/34 does not result in evidence of recovery of the cotton, gun and pistol from the three accused, because neither the cotton was stained with blood nor the gun and pistol used for the commission of murder. had gone. The deceased's statement did not confirm the two suspects, in which they were neither equipped with a weapon nor did any evidence contradict the medical evidence disclosing the injuries to a suspect attributed to a suit. The role of the third suspect was assigned. The deceased's declaration that he had caught the deceased's arm before shooting at the deceased was inconsistent with the incident as the accused could not be taken to risk the death of the deceased before being shot as he too was shot. The third accused could have been found innocent even during two successive investigations. Thus, the three accused were acquitted. immigration advocate from Moro lawyer